| 
             Present day
                Iraq was a British construct after the fall of the Ottoman Empire
                at the end of World War II. In less than a century
                  after its formation the British along with their American allies
                  are in the forefront for the deconstruction of Iraq. The trifurcation
                  of Iraq, should it come about, will not be very different from
                  the three original Ottoman provinces that were amalgamated in
                  1922 and placed under a Hashemite King. While Iraq itself may
                  have been unified comparatively recently by the British, Baghdad,
                  its capital, has a much longer history that has been woven into
                  the myths and legends of the Middle East for over a millennium.
                  In fact, no other city of the Arab world embodies so distinctly
                  the Arabian flavour than Baghdad. From AD 786-809, under fabled
                  Haroon al-Rashid - who established relations with China’s
                  Tang Dynasty and the emperor Charlemagne - Baghdad gave the world
                  astronomy, alchemy, hydraulics, diplomacy, fiscal administration
                  and the postal service. Up to the early 12th century it remained
                  the most important intellectual center in the world. Baghdad
                  had been under siege by the Assyrians and later by Cyrus the
                  Great from Persia. However, it was only in 1258 that Baghdad
                  was sacked for the first time by the Mongols riding under the
                  command of Hulagu, the grandson of Genghis Khan. Legend has it
                  that he erected a pyramid of 700,000 skulls out of his victims.
                  In 1401, another foreign invader, the Turco-Mongol Tamerlane
                  ("Timur the Lame"), devastated Baghdad yet again. Then
                  for six centuries Baghdad managed to survive relatively peacefully
                  till the “shock and awe” visited upon its inhabitants
                  by the 2003 invasion of the Anglo-American combine. 
In the most recent invasion a figure of over half a million deaths
                is already being mentioned for the Iraqis since the March 2003
                invasion. This figure could go up considerably if the deaths of
                young children caused due to malnutrition and lack of medicines
                were to be taken into account since the 1991 invasion of Iraq.
                In the latter case one or two million deaths had been reported.
                During the shock and awe bombing of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities,
                most notably Fallujah, Depleted Uranium (DU) was freely used. The
                use of DU could lead to very large number of casualties for the
                coming generations exposed to it either directly or indirectly.
                That is not all. The manner in which Iraq is sought to be vacated
                by the occupying forces could lead to further sectarian killings
                on a much larger scale than is presently the case. Iraq and the
                Iraqis have suffered enough. Surely, a way can be found to prevent
                Iraq from descending into a condition of semi-permanent chaos.
                In the ensuing paragraphs a plan of action for preventing a cataclysmic
                break up of Iraq is spelled out. 
                 
                The Action Plan 
                 
The Action Plan comprises three distinct components as under: 
- Status of the city of Baghdad 
- Restructuring Iraqi Armed Forces 
- Functioning of the Federal Structure 
Each of these aspects is amplified below. 
            The
              Status Of The City Of Baghdad 
                     
                The key to the stabilization of Iraq is the stabilization of the
                city of Baghdad; the key to the re-development of Iraq is the
                redevelopment of Baghdad. 
                First the outline plan: 
                - 
                Baghdad to be declared a separate city-state. 
                - 
                Security of Baghdad 
                - 
                Law and order in Baghdad 
                - 
                Administering Baghdad city-state 
                - 
                Infrastructure development of Baghdad 
                - 
                Restoring Civic Services in Baghdad 
                - 
                Turning Baghdad into the cultural and education center of the Arab
                World. 
            Baghdad to be Declared Separate City-State 
               
              Baghdad should be declared a separate city-state with a clearly
              delineated perimeter. Its status could be akin to the Vatican
              Status in concert with the pattern of administration followed
              for Chandigarh, the city design by the French architect, Le Corbusier
              in the early 1950s. After the trifurcation of Punjab shortly
              after the Independence of India, both the States of Punjab and
              Haryana laid claim to Chandigarh as the capital of their respective
              states. Without going into details the present status of Chandigarh
              is that it is centrally administered as a Union Territory with
              both the Punjab and Haryana state governments locating their
              governing complexes in the city. As of now the model functions
              satisfactorily with the people of Chandigarh happy to be administered
              under a central government dispensation. Neither Punjab nor Haryana
              have had any difficulty in carrying out the governing functions
              of their respective states from Chandigarh. 
            Security of Baghdad 
                   
              The security of Baghdad should be handed over for an initial ten-year
              period to a military force provided by the Egyptian government.
              The Government of Egypt would designate an Egyptian Army Corps
              for exclusive deployment in the city of Baghdad. To cater for
              expenses associated with the task Egypt would be paid US $ 2
              billion per annum for all expenses related to the security functions
              performed by the Corps in Baghdad. Every two years a review could
              be undertaken for assessing the operating expenses involved and
              the amount augmented if necessary. Similarly, the Corps could
              be beefed up by the Egyptian Government based on ground conditions.
              Payment to the latter would initially be dispensed by the US
              government.  
              The Corps Commander, whose credentials would be vetted by the US and the Iraq
              government would be given total freedom to restore law and order for the first
              two years. The Egyptian Corps would function in a manner similar to the SOFA
              (Status of Forces Agreement) that the US government negotiates for its troops
              deployed on overseas duties.  
              The Egyptian Corps Commander would be supervised by a Supervisory Committee
              comprising designated representatives from the following: The US ambassador
              in Iraq; Head of the UK Forces in Iraq; Representative of the Iraqi Government;
              Representative of the UN Secretary General; Representative of the World Health
              Organisation. Under clear guidelines framed by the Supervisory Council the
              Egyptian Force Commander would have a free hand to restore normalcy in Baghdad.
              For carrying out this task he could impose martial law in designated segments
              of the city for given periods of time in order to rid the city of weapons of
              all types held by individuals, militias or organizations operating outside
              the law or against the rules for holding or carrying of weapons promulgated
              by the Egyptian Force Commander. The Egyptian Forces deployed for the purpose
              would have the freedom to launch any type of operations for ridding the city
              of clandestine weapons or individuals or groupings attempting to take the law
              into their own hands. For security and restoration of law and order in Baghdad
              the Egyptian Force would be the sole force deployed for the purpose. The Iraqi
              Army would be based in camps situated outside the periphery of the city in
              designated areas. The Army Headquarters would remain in Baghdad. The US Army
              would be responsible for providing security cordon around the periphery of
              Baghdad city-state and for manning all entry and exit points along designated
              routes. All entities, including the US Government locations, the Iraq Government
              complexes, foreign embassies, Iraq armed forces headquarters and the like would
              be permitted to deploy security elements for protection of their respective
              complexes in situ as well as for protection of VVIPs, designated dignitaries
              or individuals. All other protection within the city would be provided by the
              Egyptian forces. The latter would have the authority to shoot or apprehend
              elements carrying weapons or causing disorder. All militias would be given
              notice by the Egyptian force commander to exit the capital within a given time
              frame, after which they would be liable to be summarily apprehended and incarcerated
              or executed. Zero tolerance in this regard would be the order of the day. In
              executing his task the Egyptian force commander will not be hampered by any
              of the other entities holding power in Iraq. 
            Maintenance
              of Law and Order & Administration
              in Baghdad City-State 
                   
              Security and day-to-day law and order are complementary functions. To begin
              with security as well as law and order would be handled by the Egyptian forces.
              They would take help from the existing police forces. Suspect elements would
              be weeded out and replaced by carefully selected personnel. The local police
              could be supplemented by the military police personnel of both the US and
              Egyptian forces. Once a semblance of security for the citizens of Baghdad
              has been ensured the strengthened local police, augmented by carefully selected
              fresh inductees, would gradually assume routine law and order functions.
              Stringent selection procedures would be established for recruiting local
              magistrates, superior judiciary for the city-state and other administrative
              elements. All persons selected would remain secular and function as per international
              norms prevalent in well-established democracies. Where necessary civil servants
              and magistrates could be hired internationally for fixed tenures with Baghdadi
              understudies. Gradually the citizens of Baghdad would assume all responsibilities
              for self-governance, including local elections under neutral supervisory
              authorities. Here again, persons showing signs of sectarianism would be excluded. 
              For the first three years the costs of running the administration of Baghdad
              would be borne by the Central government and international donors. Thereafter,
              as trade, commerce and services pick up local taxes would be levied till the
              time Baghdad becomes financially self-sustaining. 
            Infrastructure
              Development & Restoring Civic Services in Baghdad 
                   
                Going by the size of the population affected, the people of Baghdad have suffered
                the most since the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. For the average Iraqi living
                conditions, which were appalling in the earlier stages have remained abysmal
                in spite of the billions of dollars that have been sunk in. To put it mildly
                the money was misspent. Along with the stabilization of the security situation
                in the city the immediate priorities would be: restoration of electricity,
                water supplies and health and hygiene. Other development projects would be
                taken up for turning the city into a modern metropolis with first-rate transportation.
                International tenders could be floated under the aegis of a neutral body
                with impeccable credentials. Many of these services could be built on BOT
                (Build, Operate, Transfer) basis. They would provide employment to local
                Iraqis from the city. Middle class and wealthy Iraqis who have moved out
                to other countries would be invited back to help in the re-building and re-vitalization
                of the Baghdad city-state, which, in less than ten years could become one
                of the finest cities of the Middle East - a modern day version of the fabled
                dream city of the great Caliph Haroun-Al-Rashid.  
            Turning
              Baghdad into the Cultural & Education Centre of the
              Arab World 
                 
                Universities and entities from around the world would be invited to set up
                modern educational, cultural and recreational facilities. Initially these would
                be developed for the Baghdadis. Later on they would be thrown open to all Iraqis
                and students selected from the rest of the Arab World. It would be the endeavour
                of all concerned to ensure that the education provided remains modern and secular.
                Friendly governments could also chip in to set up high tech facilities in the
                city. At the end of the day the aim would be to develop Baghdad into the most
                admired and vibrant capital in the Arab World.  
            Restructuring Iraqi Armed Forces 
                   
              The broad outlines for restructuring of the Iraqi Armed Forces
              include, inter alia: 
              - The army to be divided into three commands: The Southern Command
              comprising Shiite divisions formed into one or two corps; Central
              Command comprising Sunni troops for the Sunni dominated central
              region; The Northern Command for deployment exclusively in the
              Kurdish region consisting of Kurdish troops. 
              - Simultaneously a composite command could be envisaged of carefully
              selected troops from all denominations. After suitable training
              they would become the nucleus of specialist units. 
              -The army headquarters located in Baghdad would comprise senior
              officers and personnel selected for their national and secular
              outlook and proven competence. 
              -In the first phase the three Commands would be responsible for
              security in their respective geographic commands. They would also
              be responsible for guarding the borders of Iraq in their designated
              sectors. 
              - Academies and officers’ training schools would be set up
              for joint training in facilities set up in Baghdad. All officers
              selected for training, basic as well as advanced, would be carefully
              vetted.  
              -Training facilities for non-commissioned officers and other ranks
              would be set up under respective regional commands. 
              - Medical, nursing and other specialized services would operate directly
              under Army headquarters and allocated to commands on as required
              basis. 
              Other details for professionalising the army have not been included
              in this short paper. These can be spelt out a later stage. 
             
              Functioning Of The Federal Structure 
   
                The broad parameters of the proposed trifurcation of Iraq along
                federal lines have been discussed in various forums. Much of the
                mayhem has resulted from
                irresoluteness that has crept in because of the vacillation in Washington,
                much of it brought about due to the run up to the November 2006 elections in
                the USA. Now that these are behind them, both parties – Republicans and
                Democrats - can get together purposefully to move forward to retrieve the situation
                in Iraq. There can hardly be two opinions at this point in time that the US
                policies in Iraq have generally failed. However, notwithstanding the many wrong
                turns that were taken earlier on, the US Army in Iraq is not an army that has
                been defeated or severely mauled. When a foreign country is invaded the casualties
                are expected to run into the tens of thousands in the first phase of capture
                itself. The American Army was lucky. Iraq was not seriously contested. Therefore,
                some years down the line a few thousand US casualties do not represent a critical
                situation from the military point of view. The greater problem is the demoralization
                resulting from the wrangling in Washington – irrespective of whether
                it is justified or not. The moment a clear, unmistakable plan of action is
                decided in Washington and conveyed to Iraq and the world the fog of uncertainty
                would lift and a situation considered hopeless to many would reveal facets
                that indicate brighter possibilities for stabilizing the situation. 
                One possibility would be to go along with the practically non-functioning present
                dispensation and improve its functioning by quelling sectarian conflict in
                Baghdad after declaring it a city-state and thereafter bringing about normalization
                by curtailing sectarian strife, and then spreading it outward in concentric
                circles. With persistence and clear enunciation of intent, regardless of opposition
                from various sectarian and extra-territorial interests in the region, a degree
                of normalization would automatically ensue. The present state of uncertainty
                would be dispelled after the plan, so adopted, is given bi-partisan support
                in Washington. 
                Before going into other aspects there has to be a consensus in Washington that
                the type of re-construction projects entrusted to firms like Halliburton would
                be a closed chapter. Hereafter, all funds allocated for Iraq would have to
                be overseen by a respected oversight committee comprising members from both
                parties. The reconstruction activity would require to be monitored all the
                way down the line to the execution of the projects on the ground – in
                good condition and without cost and time overruns. Half the unrest in Iraq
                and the anti-American feeling stems from mismanaged projects, diversion of
                funds and not meeting expectations made with great fanfare in Washington and
                Baghdad after an easy victory. 
                It should not be too difficult to ensure pipeline security and greater output
                from production sites once the revised plans are announced and implementation
                undertaken with quiet purposefulness and professionalism. A development tax
                should be levied at the wellhead on each barrel of oil. Its utilization and
                distribution between the federating units has to be clearly spelled out. Here
                again, if funds are properly utilized and results begin to appear on the ground
                sectarian strife would automatically come down and the animus against the US
                troops gradually simmer down. 
                The American government has to firmly indicate its stance on the question of
                US troops in Iraq. Naturally several factors having a regional bearing would
                impinge on a decision of this nature. A suggested framework could be as under: 
                - In the longer-term the US is committed to a complete withdrawal once
                normalcy is restored. A caveat relating to the Kurdish region could be put in. 
                - It would withdraw approximately 50,000 military personnel within 18
                months of the revised plan taking off on the ground. 
                - Thereafter, further reduction every six months to a year depending upon
                the competence achieved by the restructured Iraq Army. 
                It is important that the revised plan is circulated in-house in the Pentagon,
                the State Department, the Defence Department (the Pentagon should be free to
                give its own comments that may be at variance), the CIA and other selected
                committees and entities. Once a general consensus is obtained the plan should
                be communicated to all concerned and faithfully executed down the line. The
                sniping in Washington should then come down, if not cease.  
     
    Concluding Remarks 
     
                The USA has messed up things in Iraq. It was a wrong decision that was taken
                for all the wrong reasons. There was a large element of deception that has
                eroded the credibility of the US Administration – internally among the
                American people and externally among the allies. The start point for retrieving
                the situation in Iraq is to acknowledge the mistakes and then forget the past.
                Witch hunting and recrimination will not serve any purpose. Lessons would have
                been learned in Washington to ensure that such deception is never again allowed
                to influence major commitment of US forces abroad. The situation in Iraq is
                certainly grim. It is, however, far from being irretrievable. Fresh initiatives
                along the lines indicated, with sensible modifications and mid-term corrections,
                whenever required, should allow Iraq to get up on its feet again. 
             
                New Delhi 
                  November 17, 2006  
  © Vinod Saighal 
              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
             
           |