WHEN   THE DALAI LAMA TURNS EIGHTY
                                                According to the Tibetan calendar   he will do so on June 21, while the Gregorian or the universal calendar that is   used worldwide puts the date as July 6. Much rests on his longevity for the   Tibetans in     Tibet and those obliged to flee their land and   reside elsewhere, the largest numbers being in   India , the country where the Dalai Lama first   sought refuge in 1959 after fleeing   Lhasa .    A lot has been written on his successor when he leaves the world. It is   not the intention to go into the controversy in this piece. The Dalai Lama has   said in one of his statements that he intends to be around for quite a while.   Whatever the case, he has discomfited the Chinese leadership no end. They have   left no stone unturned to ensure that the Indian government does not give him   any latitude to carry out political work from Indian soil. Many other curbs are   in place. 
                                        Immense   pressure is put on countries around the world by the Chinese government to see   to it that leaders do not receive him – formally or informally -when he visits   their countries. What happened in   South Africa because of the denial of   a visa to the Dalai Lama that led to the cancellation of the international   conference due to the objections of the other delegates should have made the   world sit up. It did not. The governments of the world are coming under the sway   of the extra-territorial sovereignty exercised by the Chinese by the issuance of   ukases of this nature time and again. The governments to whom threats are issued   - and more often than not complied with - are not impoverished and weak nations   in dire straits, but some of the mightiest governments on the planet, including   the entire gamut of Western governments, the supposed champions of human rights   and liberty for citizens. It is a sad commentary that of the 194 countries in   the United Nations well over ninety percent continue to comply with Chinese   demands in this regard. The overwhelming majority among them even deny visas to   the spiritual head of the Tibetans. It is tantamount to voluntary diminishment   of national sovereignty practically across the globe. Not even the lone super   power at the zenith of its power was able to exercise such hegemonic sway over   leaders of the world’s nations. 
                                                      What will be the stance taken by the government of India when the Dalai   Lama turns eighty; more so after the recent visit of the Indian prime minister   to China. The question becomes relevant because of the succession issue as well   as the fact that in many countries where the Dalai Lama has large following   celebrations would, in all probability, take place on a grand scale. The Indian   government could either ignore the event in spite of the sentiments of the large   majority of people in India who revere him greatly; or it could choose to take a   decisive turn towards exercising sovereignty within the country that has been largely   abridged over six decades where the northern neighbor is concerned. The   invitation to Lobsang Sangay, the prime minister of the Tibetan government in   exile to take a seat alongside the other SAARC leaders at Prime Minister Modi’s   swearing-in ceremony at Rashtrapati was an unexpected bold step. The next   logical step would be to use the occasion of the eightieth birthday to   felicitate the Dalai Lama at the national level in a manner that the world sits   up and takes note. No diffidence need be shown for so-called Chinese   sensibilities, because what the government decides would be an internal matter.   In honouring one of the most admired spiritual leaders of the age the government   would be honouring the people of India and giving new hope – in the Gandhian way   – to the suffering people of Tibet. More importantly,   India ’s prestige   in the world would go up by leaps and bounds. The time has come to shed off the   artificial shackles with which the country has bound itself on internal matters   because the country across the Himalayas might   frown. The extract below is from a piece, Dalai Lama – The Man and his Vision that   was written* when he had turned sixty five.  
                                        “Time and   again the destiny of nations appears to have been moulded by their leaders. Do   leaders then encapsulate in their persona the fate of nations, or does destiny   mock nations by throwing up leaders who will follow her dictates? Whatever the   truth, the fact remains that destiny, while amenable to change cannot be unmade.   Nor can history be unwritten. The believer in the pre-ordained must then pause   to wonder whether destiny looked away: from him, his countrymen, or both. A   traveler on this perilous path must confront the dilemma of the ages to which no   really satisfactory answer has been forthcoming since time immemorial. Nobody,   not even perhaps the Dalai Lama himself, knows the answers. But he does know   that the very nature of existence posits that the struggle itself is life, karma or the lila of existence.  
                                        This follower of Buddha naturally shuns violence. He has   given Gandhi's concept a new dimension. He is willing to adjust to the reality   of the situation. He would be satisfied with Tibetan autonomy under Chinese   dispensation. The fourteenth Dalai Lama started out as a leader of the Tibetans,   as the repository of their hopes and aspirations, for this world and the next.   The intervening decades have seen his stature grow to that of a world leader,   who remains in the forefront of humanity's march towards a more humane world   order; millions more around the world look up to him for inspiration. His cause   is no longer just the cause of the preservation of a unique culture of a few   million Tibetans. The Tibetan question can perhaps no longer be tackled on the   political plane where it has proven intractable and continues to be so. An   honest attempt might now have to be made to tackle the issue on a plane where no   system or political entity needs to feel alienated or excluded from the   process”. Unquote.
                                        The Prime Minister of India has an historic opportunity to   transcend the boundary question by suggesting to his counterpart across the   Himalayas to consider the Silk   Route that suggested itself while visiting the Wild   Goose Pagoda in Xian on the first step of his journey to   China . A   21st Century Silk Route that restores the cultural heritage of the   two great ancient civilizations by linking New Delhi – Kathmandu – Lhasa –   Beijing. He has already sown the seeds by deciding on e-visas for Chinese coming   to   India .
                                          
                                        http://inosmi.ru/world/20150527/228248380.html 
                                        The article from The   Statesman, after translation, has been published by Russia's premiere portal of   the foreign media   digest.
                                        * The full article, including a Spanish translation can be read on site   www.vinodsaighal.com